An average story destroyed by pedestrian writing. The trilogy could easily have been condensed into one novel simply by tightening the writing. I literally groaned in frustration when I realised I was reading an explanation of both the meaning and the implications of the phrase "not yet". It's actually written as though it's a weekly series on TV and anything that happened 10 pages previously requires a recap. Looking past the writing and into the story, the characters were dull and uninspiring, the occasional references to their previous adventures making me feel it might have been better to know them in their younger days, before they settled down, had families and got fat.I won't be reading the rest of the series or anything else by the author. La lectura me ha parecido mucho más amena que la primera parte de la trilogía anterior. Aún así creo que dedica muchísimo tiempo (unas 200 páginas) en contarnos detenidamente lo que ya sabemos por la sinopsis. Que está bien conocer bien qué sucede pero ¿200 páginas?Está bien resuelto aunque tampoco es que sea sorprenden lo que sucede. Me ha sorprendido el cambio de algunos personajes, pero es la prueba de que en ocasiones, la gente cambia, unos para mejor, y otros para peor XD No se detiene en explicar cosas que sabemos por la otra trilogía: magia, país, habitantes. Si conocemos mucho más sobre Sachaka y sus habitante.
What do You think about La Spia Dei Maghi (2011)?
It was a little boring at times but was still interested to read to the end.
—nvn
3'5Quizás demasiado introductorio, pero un buen comienzo de saga.
—Rashad
